| General | Editorial | Need clearer explanation of process steps for both data custodian and tester | Kay Clinard | 5/13/2014 | | Open | Kay |
| General | Editorial | Need instructions on how application and PICs files are handled | Kay Clinard | 5/13/2014 | Application notes are needed...should be simplified, and ask for the only info needed. | Open | John Teeter |
| General | Editorial | 1) Data custodian sends files to CB 2) CB reviews and sends files To TL 3) TL reviews, and contacts Data custodian to schedule test 4) Test scheduled 5) Test conducted 6) Test results sent to CB 7) CB reviews and sends to Data Custodian and posts to | Kay Clinard | 5/13/2014 | Just need to follow process…. Ask to send sample file to verify mechanics… | Open | Marty & Kay |
| General | Editorial | HW Configuraiton - Do we need the particular client side HW platform characteristic? Browser number etc. | John Teeter | 5/15/2014 | Just note what works…all browsers/HW combinations should be supported…data custodian must note available browser that works. | Open | Marty |
| General | Editorial | the user account credentials problem is a blocker. It changes the dynamics of the entire test procedure. | John Teeter | 5/15/2014 | Either provide account to TL, or Make the connection yourself while TL observes. Need to be included in instructions | Open | Marty |
| General | Technical | Do we need to have an alternative way to get the .xml to the tester in this situation? | John Teeter | 5/15/2014 | No, We can require posting to UCAIug/GBITCA ftp site.Instructions…add to start of the application | Open | Marty? |
| General | Technical | Once the flow is broken, it is difficult to get going again. The step testing the validity of the time value is a particular example | John Teeter | 5/15/2014 | Time validity testing was a bit confusing, but instructions have been added to clarify | Closed | Marty |
| General | Editorial | Time evaluation spreadsheet may have a few issues | John Teeter | 5/15/2014 | Instructions have been clarified | Closed | Marty |
| General | Editorial | Forms consolidation is in order | John Teeter | 5/15/2014 | Overlaps with 4 above | Open | John & Kay |
| General | Editorial | replication of test steps (re: login) is magnified by the credentials sharing problem | John Teeter | 5/15/2014 | Addressed in 6 above…..Instructions should not require re entry…will make clearer | Open | Marty |
| 2.2 | Editorial | Filling out the 2.2 section (Identification of the test document is a manual step that should be automated to reduce errors. (Auto-Population from the application) | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | Making Applicatioin and Pics the same doc. Where possible, populate automatically……Leave to test lab | Open | Marty |
| FB 04 | Editorial | Function Block Dependencies and Optional.vs.Required is not clear (FB_04 should have been checked, but was not b/c of user confusion) | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | Improve directeions for PICS Statement is completed..Function Blocks (FBs) to be Tested (minimum 1,2,4,5): | Closed | Marty |
| | Editorial | PICs document should be merged into the Appilication and have one single, on-line, application flow. (remove error possiblity and focus on single point of data entry) | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | See 3 above…. | Open | Teeter |
| | Editorial | The validation of having purchased the standard is a manual step that is not easily accomplished. Can we get simpler integration w/o the copy/paste from a PDF? | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | Covered Above.. | Open | |
| Login | Editorial | Navigation within the portal under test seems to be error prone. Finding Logout was a problem (it was called sign-out). | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | Need to identify logout/off | Open | Marty |
| 2.3.2.4 | Editorial | Test Step 2.3.2.4 re: what is the time reference for the first interval block. -- The testor has choosen the the time and should not need to ask the testee for that information? | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | Instructions have been adjusted | Closed | Marty |
| 2.3.2.4 | Editorial | The manual validation of timestamp should be automated. | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | Possibility…will make instructions clearer | Open | |
| 2.3.2.4 | Editorial | The testor ability to navigate the xml is not what we should be testing | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | acknowleged | Closed | |
| 2.3.2.4 | Editorial | (@15 minutes testing if the time stamps are valid!) (make that 20 minutes!!)(make that 30 Minutes!!!) | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | Training Tester | Open | |
| FB 02 | Editorial | The on-line test validator is missing FB_02 (so does not correspond to the PICs) | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | Need to make clearer FBs required/valid | Open | Marty |
| | Editorial | There is some formating issues with using text "===============" .vs. horizontalRules in the word document that causes miss-steps by the testor. | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | Replaced by box | Closed | Marty |
| 2.4.2 | Editorial | 2.4.2 - PII - we have already downloaded the .xml and do not need to do it again. (so the test steps are not being followed - and shouldn't be) | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | If logged in from a previous step/file downloaded in previous step...note added... | Closed | Marty |
| Summary | Editorial | It is difficult to see the "Summary" of what has happened when the testing is completed. | John Teeter | 5/16/2014 | added to 2.2 summary of results...???Need to ensure consistency..where possible eliminate redundant entries | Open | Marty |
| Process | Technical | Schedule seperate meeting to review need for multiple downloada | Team Review | 6/24/2014 | | Open | John Teeter & Kay |
| | Technical | Need to include <link> reference to Certification ID. | Jeremy J. Roberts (GBA) | 2015-04-30 | Add <link rel="related" href="https://cert.greenbuttonalliance.org/certificate/987654321987654321" /> Atom link to each data stream/file to allow consumers of the data (third party tools or individuals) to find provenance and detail of the certification. | Open | Marty Burns |